Tuesday, March 19, 2019
Essay --
OverviewUpon entering the field of medicine, physicians book to practice jibe to the Hippocratic Oath which states, first, do no harm. Although it seems give dispense this task would be straight forward, it is not always clear on how to carry come out of the closet this oath. One example of where conflicting viewpoints are ofttimes argued is how to resolve barbarian abuse consequences such(prenominal)(prenominal) as Munchausen Syndrome by procurator (MSbP). MSbP is a comparatively new conformity of small fry abuse in which a reboot deliberately fabricates illnesses in their tike to receive medical exam checkup attention. Over the departed 30 years, the recognition and prevalence of MSbP has increased, however, it is still punishing to identify and is extremely under diagnosed (Maldonado, 2002). It has stirred much controversy and still the name itself is a topic of debate because MSbP is hard to define. Other foothold to describe the agent include factitious disor der by proxy, pediatric condition falsification, and medical baby bird abuse (Lowen & Reece, 2008). In treating a child that may be a victim of MSbP, using covert photo surveillance (CVS) is moot because blurred lines exist between using for it for diagnostic reasons versus legal reasons. When conducting CVS, typically two hidden cameras, placed in objects such as a wall clock or a detonating device light, monitor a parents military action without their knowledge (Shabde & Craft, 1999). A member of the dread team, such as a nurse, and a legal philosophy officer espouse the video footage from a remote site to impression for suspicious occupation and intervene if the parent begins to harm the child. Some activity that is typically seen on footage include a parent poisoning their child with cleaning upshot or salt, removing medical devices such as tubes, and suffocative the child. Clinical Per... ...rs of the care team is communicating effectively with each other. person alised Perspective subsequently researching the various viewpoints regarding CVS, I still maintain that it is honourable when used in good faith in order to entertain the child. Many case studies have shown that not only is the child more likely to be put in a safer environment when child protective go has the evidence to intervene but it also saves siblings from latent harm. I commit that the physicians role is to act in the best care of the patient, especially when outside factors pose a flagellum to the childs well-being. Although many view CVS as unethical because it infringes on privacy rights, it locoweed also provide a great benefit. Studies such as the hotshot conducted by David Southall make it difficult to dispute that in that location is not a value from using CVS as a form of diagnosis and intervention. Essay -- OverviewUpon entering the field of medicine, physicians agree to practice according to the Hippocratic Oath which states, first, do no harm. Although it seems like this task would be straight forward, it is not always clear on how to carry out this oath. One example of where conflicting viewpoints are often argued is how to resolve child abuse cases such as Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSbP). MSbP is a relatively new form of child abuse in which a parent deliberately fabricates illnesses in their child to receive medical attention. Over the past 30 years, the recognition and prevalence of MSbP has increased, however, it is still difficult to identify and is highly under diagnosed (Maldonado, 2002). It has stirred much controversy and even the name itself is a topic of debate because MSbP is hard to define. Other terms to describe the condition include factitious disorder by proxy, pediatric condition falsification, and medical child abuse (Lowen & Reece, 2008). In treating a child that may be a victim of MSbP, using covert video surveillance (CVS) is controversial because blurred lines exist between using for it for diagnostic reasons versus legal reasons. When conducting CVS, typically two hidden cameras, placed in objects such as a wall clock or a ceiling light, monitor a parents activity without their knowledge (Shabde & Craft, 1999). A member of the care team, such as a nurse, and a police officer observe the video footage from a remote site to look for suspicious activity and intervene if the parent begins to harm the child. Some activity that is typically seen on footage include a parent poisoning their child with cleaning solution or salt, removing medical devices such as tubes, and smothering the child. Clinical Per... ...rs of the care team is communicating effectively with each other. Personal PerspectiveAfter researching the various viewpoints regarding CVS, I still maintain that it is ethical when used in good faith in order to protect the child. Many case studies have shown that not only is the child more likely to be put in a safer environment when child protective services h as the evidence to intervene but it also saves siblings from potential harm. I believe that the physicians role is to act in the best interest of the patient, especially when outside factors pose a threat to the childs well-being. Although many view CVS as unethical because it infringes on privacy rights, it can also provide a great benefit. Studies such as the one conducted by David Southall make it difficult to dispute that there is not a value from using CVS as a form of diagnosis and intervention.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.