Intercultural communication and power distance Essay

Power is believed to be the capacity of individual to exercise function over other people and resources. Power is a tool that has twain positive and negative outcomes depending on how it is applied (Visagie, 2006). The ability to exercise king derives from various sources ranging from economic, political and social dimensions. For instance in m either nations change economic status sic who frustrates what and when. A sociologist such as Karl Marx in his infringe perspective outlines how business office relationships continue to heighten the wrangle amidst societal single outes. There be various types of military group ranging from political, cultural and economic.Sources of agent well-disposed factors such the norms, values and believes in a society determine control over resources.in most societies men are given priorities to women in matters pertaining leadership. The girl child for example has been undermined in most societies (Castells, 2007). Power is left in the h and of men with women even off looking d confess at themselves. People continue to conform to these values even in the new period.Economics status also dictates forcefulness in many societies .according to the conflict approach indicator in any society is determined by social class. Every society is characterized by three classes of individuals the rich, the middle class and the poor. The rich are the owners of capital while the middle- class and the poor own little or nothing. The owners of capital employ the poor in their firms for engage and salaries (Bachrach, & Baratz, 2002). The owners of capital fear that the poor might overthrow them from business leader to get back their resources.it is inherent that the capitalists will continues to exploit the poor. Karl Marx proposes a transition from capitalist economy to socialism and laterPolitical factors also signify a part source. The leaders exercise control over the natives, a lot of rampart is expected from the leaders a s they try to cover their status quo.Political power can be acquired in various agencys for instance by coercion, voting among others. Politicians are well known to use their convincing strategies to bewilder power andCulture is also a source of power in some societies. Various cultural practices symbolize a source of power. In some societies for instance the women are discriminated against men in leadership lay outs. any(prenominal) societies have affectionate believes that leadership is only meant for men and that women should remain subordinate. In many societies be led by women is a taboo and any woman who stands to firm to seek power may end existence excommunicated in the society.The concept of power maintainPower outgo refers to the way in which power is shared and the degree with which the less powerful remove that power is unevenly distributed. Whilst countries such as Australia are at pocket-size power distance, Asian countries such as Saudi-Arabian Arabia are at the nobleest power distance. Individuals in high power distance are believed to espouse that power and responsibility are life facts .this essay focuses at exploring how the high power distance in Saudi Arabia challenges conflicts between leaders and subordinates.In states having high power distance those who are not powerful cause power relations that are more monocratic. The inferior appreciate the sureness of others easily based on where they are situated in received formal standards.Higher power distance countries believe that inequality is good, all sensation has his or her own place, people should depend on their leader, and that the powerful should not pelt their power and are entitled to many privileges. For instance, even if one was to necessitate to be promoted in their current positions, it will be inappropriate to take their employer for such promotion. If the employer wanted to give their employee a promotion, they would, and the employee has absolutely not hearty to the issue.Power distance in Saudi ArabiaStudies claim that Saudi Arabia experiences the highest power distance in the world. Various reasons explain this power distance, the main one being religion for instance if one is not a Islamic the law requires that he cannot be permitted to enter the country without an invitation or even leave without a permit. Visitors are expected to adhere to same laws as Saudis. The Islamic conviction widens this power difference and promotes that those in leadership position should remain.Moreover psychological and sociological reasons fuel the higher power distance. Social values and norms are passed from parent to children through the execute of socialization. For instance Saudi Arabians advocate that obeying the mighty and supporting the leadership is of much magnificence (In Hopkins & In Ibrahim, 1997). This calls for following of orders without questioning where any disagreement with the leaders termination is regarded as rebellion. The Saudis have been all through internalizing this power distance as their cultural practice.Following the high power distance in Saudi Arabia a lot of inequalities have continuously manifested with the most prominent being uneven distribution of wealth. Saudi Arabia also is highly ranked in terms of purchasing power diverseial. The gap between the purchasing power of the rich and the poor is quite wide (Al-Saud, 2003). This clearly shows that the income is unevenly bedcover within the society.The power distance also influences laws and regulations owing to the inadequate ascendency the regime has in Saudi Arabia (In Hopkins & In Ibrahim, 1997). The natives have a strong notion that mighty will dissociate themselves from the group but this is not challenged by the population. The power distance also affects contractual relationships. Reidenbach and Robins (1988) explores how variances on two of hofstedes national finis dimensions, collectivism and power distance are articulat ed to the way firms make ethical decisions.Power Distance in other nationsWhile all nations and values are cannot be compared, the chemical chain of disparities keep changing from finish to another. The reported low power distance in the United States of America is no surprise. The Americans emphasize on familiarity and justice for all the people including both those in leadership and the American natives. This is also shown through the continued emphasis of equal rights in every aspect of the United States leadership and community. Within American organizations, organizational twist is developed for purpose of convenience, leaders are always reachable and managers depone on individual employees and teams for their practices. Managers and employees expect to be discussed in any process that entails critical decisions, and information is interchange within the different levels of leadership and authority. on board this, communication is formal, direct and touching all the nation al levels.Intercultural communication and power distanceAlthough power distance may appear unimportant when base to a new cultural environment, knowing how it impacts an individual could be of grandeur ( supposition of plane crashes).even though power distance may be regarded unessential in intercultural communication it is important knowing the shell time and best method to converse with one another. The process of transition from one culture demand Saudi Arabia to establish an effective channel that will go steady the power distance is reduced as much as possible. The theory of the plane crash explains in detail why intercultural communication is of importance in dealing with power distance.ConclusionThe study clearly demonstrates that different countries have varying degrees of power distance. While countries like U.S.A have the utmost power distance Saudi Arabia reported the highest power distance in the whole world. In summary the research explores the varying diversities of power distance in Saudi Arabia.ReferencesAl-Saud, F. S. (2003). Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Power politics in transition 1968-1971. London u.a. Tauris.Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (2002). Two faces of power. American political science review, 56(04), 947-952.Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International journal of communication, 1(1), 29.In Hopkins, N. S., & In Ibrahim, S. E. (1997). Arab society Class, gender, power, and development.Pillai, R., Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (1999). leading and organizational justice Similarities and differences across cultures. Journal of International Business Studies, 763-779.Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). lump countries on attitudinal dimensions A review and synthesis. Academy of management review, 435-454.Visagie, J. (2006). Power, meaning and culture John Thompsons depth hermeneutics and the ideological topography of modernity. South African journal of philosophy, 15(2), 73-8 3.Source document